I was adjusting the position of our projector to allow for bigger prints to be generated. I encountered a problem that at larger distances, our prints are not seeming to adhere as desired.

Does the inverse square law of light apply to DLP projectors?

I am aware that the inverse-square law only is 100% applicable when you have a point as your light source. But I assume close to the same holds constant for other real world light sources.

Unless DLP projectors compensate for distance with their power output. Is this the case?

Cross-Post: @ Physics.SE

  • $\begingroup$ I am currently troubleshooting this. Running a print right now with the law applied. So far it seems much more solidly adhered. $\endgroup$
    – DMrFrost
    Jun 29 '17 at 21:32
  • $\begingroup$ I got pretty decent adhesion with a longer layer times. Im guessing that this is indeed the case. $\endgroup$
    – DMrFrost
    Jun 29 '17 at 22:15
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it has been cross-posted at physics.SE and is probably more suitable there. $\endgroup$ Jun 30 '17 at 8:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ While this question would probably be quickly answered over at Physics.SE, I believe the content is best suited for 3DPrinting.SE. @TomvanderZanden we need to broaden our spectrum of questions regarding other 3D Printer types and draw in more experts. Our site currently has a strong hold on FDM printing to accommodate advanced questions, but I don't feel that we're there yet in other 3D printing types. So, I'm leaving this question open in hopes to encourage more questions about DLP printers. $\endgroup$
    – tbm0115
    Jul 2 '17 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ @tbm0115 This question has already been cross-posted (verbatim) on Physics.SE and gotten good answers here. Having the same question exist on two different SE's is not good. See here for a meta discussion. This question could possibly be salvaged by turning it into a more 3D printing specific question. However, allowing substandard questions in a hope to attract more experts is counterproductive. Experts are attracted by interesting, high-quality questions. $\endgroup$ Jul 2 '17 at 19:32

Yes, of course it does. The same amount of light is being spread across a wider area, so there's less light per area. Once you're past a few 10's of filament diameters, a point source is a highly accurate representation of most light bulbs. Even more so when there's a lens setup that causes the light to go through a point focus.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I just wasn't sure if projection software for stereolithographic printers was set up in a way that compensated for this falloff by boosting power. $\endgroup$
    – DMrFrost
    Jun 29 '17 at 23:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.