Timeline for Which kinematic system has the highest quality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2020 at 6:04 | comment | added | Mahan Lamee | @0scar I mean Prusa by cartesian. The style that bed moves in the y-axis, the nozzle moves in x and z-axis. Like Prusa i3 mk3. | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 22:08 | history | edited | 0scar♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Typo
|
| Aug 5, 2020 at 13:22 | comment | added | R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE | I think terminology usage differs. To me Cartesian means each of the X, Y, and Z motors directly controls an orthogonal axis. This excludes corexy. | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 13:09 | comment | added | 0scar♦ | @MahanLameie Please note, a CoreXY is also a Cartesian printer! | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:34 | comment | added | R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE | I don't think it matters which part moves relative to the other in Z. There's only one Z motion per layer, and you just want it to be rigid and reproducible. With corexy, making the bed move in Z is easier to do well. | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:20 | comment | added | Mahan Lamee | As I said is it good for the nozzle to also move in z-axis in addition to x and y in corexy? Does it increase or decrease print quality? | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:19 | vote | accept | Mahan Lamee | ||
| Aug 6, 2020 at 6:00 | |||||
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:18 | comment | added | R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE | If you go slow enough, there should be little if any difference. Cartesian (with moving bed) has more momentum to deal with in the axis the bed moves on. I guess in theory corexy has more belt length for belt to stretch along. It's definitely better at high speed/acceleration though. | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:12 | comment | added | Mahan Lamee | So you mean that if I use belts, there is no quality difference between corexy and cartesian. right? | |
| Aug 5, 2020 at 11:00 | history | answered | R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE | CC BY-SA 4.0 |