Timeline for PETG nozzle clearance and extrusion multiplier
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2020 at 21:19 | answer | added | Joseph Noble | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 25, 2019 at 11:31 | vote | accept | Fredo Corleone | ||
| Feb 5, 2019 at 0:08 | comment | added | anttix | How long of a print it is and does ot show "buggers" from material collecting on the nozzle? I mean PETG does stick to nozzle somewhat no matter what you do. That's why it's recommended to clean the ouside of the nozzle before each print. | |
| Jan 28, 2019 at 18:15 | answer | added | anttix | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 27, 2019 at 23:42 | answer | added | 0scar♦ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 27, 2019 at 23:29 | history | edited | 0scar♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update from comment
|
| Jan 27, 2019 at 10:53 | comment | added | Fredo Corleone | Calibration distance... | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 23:02 | comment | added | 0scar♦ | @FredoCorleone So you mean the calibration distance between nozzle and bed or first layer height, it is still not clear what you mean. | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 17:39 | comment | added | Fredo Corleone | I've tried to make my question clearer. If not I'm more than willing to edit again. | |
| Jan 26, 2019 at 17:37 | history | edited | Fredo Corleone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 81 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Jan 26, 2019 at 8:50 | review | Close votes | |||
| Feb 16, 2019 at 3:05 | |||||
| Jan 26, 2019 at 8:30 | comment | added | 0scar♦ | @FredoCorleone I have assumed that with "clearance" you meant the paper distance when bed levelling, also known as Z offset, maybe it is better you make that more clear. Both questions are now unclear. Please update by edit, thanks! | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 20:59 | comment | added | Fredo Corleone | By dirty I mean that the nozzle seems to gather all strings (or whatever) and gets dirtier and dirtier during the print. The print itself remains good, I mean that there are no trace of nozzle dragging over the surface. | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 20:58 | history | edited | Fredo Corleone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 18:50 | comment | added | Trish | Clearance is machine, not material dependant. You also speak about initial layer thickness, not clearance, which is space between parts | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 15:45 | comment | added | 0scar♦ | @CarlWitthoft Your comment about the temperature makes perfect sense in light of of the OP's mentioning of stringing also! | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 15:25 | comment | added | Carl Witthoft | Is it solely the clearance on the first layer that's a problem here? If so, adjust the Z-axis stop. If the nozzle appears to be running into every layer, then as @Oscar suggests, your "underextrusion" value is really a proper calibration for the nozzle in use. BTW: what is "dirty" ? If you mean burnt bits, just drop the temperature. | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 14:43 | history | edited | 0scar♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 14:19 | comment | added | 0scar♦ | Your second question seems a bit strange, any value lower than 100 % will cause under-extrusion, so what is optimal? Any value different than 100 % means that you have not calibrated the nozzle well. | |
| Jan 25, 2019 at 14:04 | history | edited | 0scar♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improved formatting
|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 9:36 | history | asked | Fredo Corleone | CC BY-SA 4.0 |